Comments on: Method_missing requires responds_to? http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2009/01/13/responds_to-requires-method_missing/ A whole bunch of nought thought by Chris Cummer Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:29:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: chris http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2009/01/13/responds_to-requires-method_missing/comment-page-1/#comment-4179 chris Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:45:32 +0000 http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/?p=268#comment-4179 Antti: you're absolutely correct - thanks for catching that! Antti: you’re absolutely correct – thanks for catching that!

]]> By: coderrr http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2009/01/13/responds_to-requires-method_missing/comment-page-1/#comment-4178 coderrr Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:13:12 +0000 http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/?p=268#comment-4178 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/solving-the-method_missing-respond_to-problem/ http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/solving-the-method_missing-respond_to-problem/

]]> By: Antti Tarvainen http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2009/01/13/responds_to-requires-method_missing/comment-page-1/#comment-4177 Antti Tarvainen Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:42:42 +0000 http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/?p=268#comment-4177 Maybe it's just me, but... Shouldn't the title be the other way around? "Method_missing requires responds_to?" Maybe it’s just me, but…

Shouldn’t the title be the other way around? “Method_missing requires responds_to?”

]]> By: Julian Russell http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2009/01/13/responds_to-requires-method_missing/comment-page-1/#comment-4176 Julian Russell Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:31:57 +0000 http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/?p=268#comment-4176 Word. I recently wrote a quick wrapper for a java API that rubyised most of the method calls using method_missing (underscore -> camelCase etc). I would have just felt dirty if I hadn't done the responds_to? implementation as well. Word. I recently wrote a quick wrapper for a java API that rubyised most of the method calls using method_missing (underscore -> camelCase etc).

I would have just felt dirty if I hadn’t done the responds_to? implementation as well.

]]>