<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deprecated @flash Warnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/</link>
	<description>A whole bunch of nought thought by Chris Cummer</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Binary Code &#187; Solving the Depricated @Flash Warning</title>
		<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Binary Code &#187; Solving the Depricated @Flash Warning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>[...] long ago I ran into an issue in which my use of flash always generated a warning, though I thought I was implementing it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] long ago I ran into an issue in which my use of flash always generated a warning, though I thought I was implementing it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Dmitry, thanks! Solved it perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dmitry, thanks! Solved it perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Sabanin</title>
		<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Sabanin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Don't name your flash partial "_flash.rhtml", name it something else, like "_flash_box.rhtml". This is a known bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t name your flash partial &#8220;_flash.rhtml&#8221;, name it something else, like &#8220;_flash_box.rhtml&#8221;. This is a known bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Nope, not yet. Mostly I've just been ignoring them until I stumble across some docs explaining it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, not yet. Mostly I&#8217;ve just been ignoring them until I stumble across some docs explaining it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugeats</title>
		<link>http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>bugeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.postal-code.com/binarycode/2007/03/28/deprecated-flash-warnings/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I have this same problem.  Annoys the hell out of me.  Ever find a fix?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this same problem.  Annoys the hell out of me.  Ever find a fix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
